1. youngjim | Rated | 07 Oct 2008 | Add A Review

I didnt expect canterbury to be this good. Good greens and fairways with practice facilities and a good clubhouse. A good course for beginners with no bunkers. Good green fees. This is a lot better than Hurstville.

2. noodles | Rated | 03 Dec 2007 | Add A Review

It’s cheap, fairly well kept and good for beginners (easy course). Only 9 holes. No booking required. If you go during off-peak times, you can get straight on. Other times, expect to half an hour.

3. greenside1 | Rated | 08 Jun 2006 | Add A Review

This course has slowish greens and the fairways are quite dry. Played here last week and waited for 1/2 hour before hitting a shot. Practice nets and putting greens make the wait easier to deal with, but the addition of bookings would make this course better.

It is a relatively easy course with most holes requiring iron off the tee to set up easy approach, or driver off the tee to have a chip left. Par 5 here plays hard in wind, but should not need to hit driver 3 wood to reach it. If you are a 10 or better handicap, expect to get close to par if you play well. Needs bunkers desperately. Good value, needs improvement.

4. wtam | Rated | 01 Jun 2006 | Add A Review

Played here on last Sunday. The greens are very nice and the fairways are kept in good condition.

We arrived around 2:00pm, and waited for one and half hours! Paid for 18 holes ($16.50) but only 9 holes can be finished before dark.

5. badboy | Rated | 19 Apr 2006 | Add A Review

I've played here a couple of times.

For a cheap 9 hole public course it's not too bad but it could be made SO much better with the adition of some bunkers - there are absolutely none at all.

The only real gripe I have with this place is the ridiculous queue to play on a weekend. There's no booking a tee time - you just have to rock up and take your chances. I've got there fairly early in the morning both times I have played - the latest being about 8am and waited for well over an hour both times.

If you can work out a way to avoid the queues and you can't get on anywhere else then it's probably worth a go - but I wouldn;t bother on a weekend morning.

6. Q-TIP | Rated | 25 Nov 2005 | Add A Review

There is no ACR is not listed on the scorecard. But for a 9 hole GC it is not too bad. The course measures 2215 metres Par 34 from the back blue tees and has no bunkers on the course.

1st: 165m Par3. Straight hit with a mid-iron

2nd: 102m Par3. Wedge will do the work.

3rd: 214m Par 4. Straight wood, but tee has being moved up from 295m

4th. 259m Par 4. Slight dogleg to the left can be reached from the tee. OOB on the right

5th: 441m Par 5. Land it on the downslope of the fairway and reachable for 2.

6th: 355m Par 4. Not as easy as it looks. Plays the hardest hole. Slight dogleg to the right to an elevated green that drops off sharply.

7th: 123m Par 3. Straight hit can do the job. OOB on the right

8th: 297m Par 4. Slight dogleg to the left. Good drive can set up birdie.

9th: 259m Par 4. Same as the 8th hole, but dogleg to the right.

Played here on 25/11/05 and paid $8 for 9 holes after 5pm (Monday to Fridays only), otherwise you pay $14 for 9 holes. Use the course as a practice course.

7. andrew14966 | Rated | 29 Dec 2002 | Add A Review

This is not much more than a practice course. An ACR is listed, but I doubt it would be 68. It should be more like 65.

A couple of the bunkerless par 4's you can drive.